The Building Permit Process Explained: A Step-by-Step Guide to Plan Review and Approval

The building permit. Is it a frustrating bureaucratic bottleneck or a critical risk management checkpoint? For seasoned professionals, it’s a vital dialogue with the city that transforms a design into a legally buildable project. Navigating this process isn't about luck—it's about strategy, and missteps lead to costly redesigns and significant budget overruns.

This expert guide reveals the single most important factor for a smooth approval: meticulous pre-submittal preparation. The work you do before ever contacting the permit office has the greatest impact on your timeline, yet it's the most common point of failure. Learn why an incomplete submittal package is the top cause of delays and master the first crucial step—conducting thorough code research that uncovers the full regulatory landscape for your project.

Stop seeing the permit as a final hurdle. Read our step-by-step guide to turn the approval process from a source of frustration into a strategic advantage.

‍

This comprehensive guide will demystify the building permit process, breaking it down into distinct stages. We will move beyond the theoretical and into the practical, offering actionable insights to help your project team navigate the path from submittal to approval with confidence and skill.

Stage 1: Pre-Submittal Preparation – The Foundation of a Smooth Review

The most common reason for a delayed permit is an incomplete or poorly prepared submittal package. The work you do before ever setting foot in the permit office (or logging into the online portal) will have the greatest impact on your timeline.

Code Research and Feasibility

Before a single line is drawn, a thorough due diligence phase is essential. This isn't just about identifying the primary building code (e.g., the 2021 International Building Code). It’s about uncovering the full regulatory landscape.

• Identify Governing Codes: Pinpoint the exact edition of the building, residential, fire, mechanical, plumbing, and energy codes adopted by the jurisdiction.
• Uncover Local Amendments: This is a critical and often-missed step. Most municipalities have a package of local amendments that modify, add, or delete sections of the model codes. These can significantly impact design requirements for everything from seismic bracing to sprinkler thresholds.
• Zoning and Land Use Ordinances: Confirm that the proposed use, building height, setbacks, and floor area ratio (FAR) comply with local zoning laws. A building that is perfectly code-compliant but violates zoning is a non-starter.
• Other Agency Requirements: Does the project require input from a Department of Transportation, a local health department (for restaurants or medical facilities), or a historical preservation board? Identify these stakeholders early.

The Strategic Pre-Submittal Meeting

For any project of moderate complexity, a pre-submittal meeting with the AHJ is one of the most valuable hours you can spend. This is not a formal review but a collaborative discussion. The goal is to:

• Introduce the Project: Provide a high-level overview of the scope, occupancy, and construction type.
• Clarify Code Interpretations: If your design employs an alternative material or method, or if you have a question about a nuanced code section, this is the time to ask. Gaining alignment with the plan reviewer upfront prevents a major redesign later.
• Identify Potential Red Flags: The AHJ may immediately spot issues you hadn't considered, such as a local fire department access requirement or a newly adopted stormwater management ordinance.

Expert Tip: Come prepared for this meeting with a preliminary site plan, basic floor plans, and a list of specific, targeted questions. Vague inquiries will yield vague answers. Show the AHJ you’ve done your homework.

Assembling the Permit Application Package

A complete package is your ticket to an efficient review. While specific requirements vary, a typical submittal package includes:

• Completed Permit Application Form: Ensure it is signed by the property owner and the licensed professionals.
• Construction Documents: A full set of drawings (architectural, structural, MEP, etc.) and specifications, sealed and signed by the registered design professional.
• Structural Calculations: A bound set of calculations supporting the structural design.
• Energy Code Compliance Documentation: This often includes forms like COMcheck or REScheck, demonstrating compliance with thermal envelope and systems requirements.
• Geotechnical Report: For new construction, a soil investigation report is almost always required.
• Special Inspection and Testing Agreements: A form outlining the required special inspections (e.g., high-strength concrete, structural welding) and the agency responsible for performing them.
• Other Supporting Documents: This could include truss calculations, deferred submittal agreements, or reports from specialized consultants.

Stage 2: The Plan Review Cycle – Navigating the Process

Once your package is submitted, it enters the plan review cycle. Understanding what happens behind the counter is key to managing the process.

Intake and Initial Screening

The first stop is the permit technician's desk. This is a completeness check, not a technical review. The technician will verify that all required forms are present, plans are signed and sealed, and fees have been paid. An application can be rejected at this stage for something as simple as a missing signature.

Disciplinary Reviews (The "Round Robin")

After passing intake, the plans are routed to various municipal departments for concurrent review. Each reviewer is a subject matter expert focused on their specific domain.

‍

The Review Comments and Response Cycle

It is rare for a complex project to be approved on the first submission. More often, you will receive a "comment letter" or "correction notice" that consolidates feedback from all reviewing disciplines. This is the start of the crucial back-and-forth.

Best Practices for Responding to Comments:

1. Acknowledge and Address Every Comment: Do not ignore a comment, even if you disagree with it.
2. Provide a Written Narrative: Create a clear response letter that restates each comment and then explains how you have addressed it. Reference the specific code section you are complying with.
3. Clearly Show the Change: Don't just say you made a change—show it. Use revision clouds on the drawings to highlight every modification. Point the reviewer directly to the sheet and detail where the correction can be found (e.g., "See revised Detail 3/A5.1").
4. Communicate, Don't Argue: If you believe a reviewer has misinterpreted the code, schedule a call or meeting to discuss it. Frame your position with code references and logical arguments. An adversarial approach is rarely productive.

This cycle may repeat two or three times for a complex project. An organized, professional, and thorough response is the fastest way to get through it.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Decades of experience reveal a pattern of common, avoidable errors that bog down the permit process.

• Pitfall 1: Ignoring Local Amendments.
  
  
  
  • Scenario: An architect designs a building based on the unamended IBC, only to find the city has a local amendment requiring an additional exit for their occupancy type.
  • Solution: Always obtain and review the jurisdiction's specific code amendments during the initial code research phase. They are usually available on the municipality's website.
• Pitfall 2: Uncoordinated Documents.
  
  
  
  • Scenario: The architectural plans show fire-rated walls in one location, but the mechanical plans show a large, non-fire-rated duct penetrating that same wall without a proper detail.
  • Solution: Implement a rigorous, internal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process before submittal. The principal architect or lead engineer should perform a cross-disciplinary check to ensure all drawing sets are coordinated.
• Pitfall 3: Vague Scope of Work.
  
  
  
  • Scenario: A permit for a tenant improvement is described as "Interior Remodel," leaving the plan reviewer to guess which walls are new, existing, or being demolished.
  • Solution: Provide a clear, detailed scope of work on the cover sheet. Use demolition plans and phased drawings to clearly delineate what is existing and what is proposed.
• Pitfall 4: Accessibility (ADA) Oversights.
  
  
  
  • Scenario: A project is stalled in review because restroom layouts lack proper clearances, door maneuvering clearances are insufficient, or accessible parking slopes exceed 2%.
  • Solution: Treat accessibility compliance as a primary design driver from day one, not an afterthought. Pay meticulous attention to details in restrooms, at building entrances, and along the accessible route.

Stage 3: Permit Approval and Issuance

Once all review comments have been resolved to the satisfaction of every department, the project moves to final approval.

Final Review and Fee Calculation

A final administrative review ensures all holds have been released. The permit fees, often based on the project's construction valuation, are calculated and an invoice is issued. Be prepared for substantial fees on large projects, which cover the review and future inspection costs.

Receiving the Approved Set and Permit Card

Upon payment, you will receive the official building permit. This package typically includes:

• The Permit Card: This must be posted in a conspicuous location on the job site.
• The "Stamped" Approved Set: A set of construction documents bearing the official stamp of the building department. This is the legal set of drawings that must be kept on-site at all times.

The contractor is legally obligated to build the project in exact accordance with this approved set. Any proposed changes, no matter how minor, must be submitted as a revision and approved by the AHJ before the work is performed.

Key Takeaways

The building permit process is a marathon, not a sprint. Success is defined not by avoiding review comments entirely, but by managing them efficiently.

• Front-Load the Effort: The most critical work happens before you submit. Thorough research and a strategic pre-submittal meeting can prevent months of delays.
• Think Like a Reviewer: Present information that is clear, complete, organized, and easy to find. An overworked plan reviewer will appreciate a well-prepared package.
• Embrace the Dialogue: View the review process as a collaboration aimed at a common goal: a safe, compliant, and successful building. Maintain professionalism and clear communication throughout.

By mastering this process, you transform it from a source of anxiety into a predictable, manageable, and even valuable part of the project delivery lifecycle. You build not only compliant structures but also a reputation for professionalism that will serve you, your firm, and your clients for years to come.

‍